103 N.E.2d 399 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. 1951), Leyman Corp. v. Piggly-Wiggly Corp.

Citation: 103 N.E.2d 399, 90 Ohio App. 506

Opinion Judge: Per Curiam.

Party Name: LEYMAN CORP. v. PIGGLY-WIGGLY CORP.

Attorney: Peck, Shaffer & Williams, Andrew J. Conroy, Jr. and Cottle, Campbell & Druffel, all of Cincinnati, for intervenor-appellee. Nichols, Wood, Marx & Ginter, Harry Kasfir, John Osoinach and Roy Holmes, all of Cincinnati, for defendant-appellant. Messrs. Peck, Shaffer & Williams, Mr. A. J. Conroy and...

Judge Panel: HILDEBRANT, P. J., and MATTHEWS and ROSS, JJ., concur.

Case Date: May 21, 1951

Court: Ohio Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

103 N.E.2d 399 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. 1951), Leyman Corp. v. Piggly-Wiggly Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 34 N.E. 332 (Ohio 1893), Bonewitz v. Bonewitz
Ohio - 50 N.E.2d 331 (Ohio 1943), 29583, Le Maistre v. Clark
Ohio - 68 N.E.2d 486 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. 1944), H.S. Leyman Co. v. Piggly-Wiggly Corp.