103 N.E.2d 37 (Ohio App. 6 Dist. 1951), Haag v. Meffley
Linked as:
Extract
103 N.E.2d 37 (Ohio App. 6 Dist. 1951), Haag v. Meffley
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Ohio - 140 N.E. 510 (Ohio 1923), 17837, State v. Le Blond
- Ohio - 173 N.E. 305 (Ohio 1930), 22177, Scholl v. Scholl
- Ohio - 199 N.E. 353 (Ohio 1936), 25598, Executors and administrators Presentation of claims by creditors Sections 10509112 and 10509134, General Code Owner of promissory note not required to present claim Fiduciary in possession of note for collection The provisions of Sections 10509112 and 10509134, General Code 114 Ohio Laws, 320), 25598, do not require the owner of a promissory note to present his claim thereunder to an executor or administrator when the executor or administrator at the time of his appointment is already in possession of the note for collection, Gerhold v. Papathanasion
- Ohio - 47 N.E. 541 (Ohio 1897), Kingsborough v. Tousley
- Ohio - 13 N.E.2d 920 (Ohio App. 8 Dist. 1937), Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Doolittle
