102 A.2d 778 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1954), A-649, Pomeroy v. Simon

Citation: 102 A.2d 778, 29 N.J.Super. 439

Opinion Judge: JAYNE, S.J.A.D.

Party Name: POMEROY et al. v. SIMON et al.

Attorney: Max L. Rosenstein, Newark, argued the cause for appellants. Adrian M. Unger, Newark, argued the cause for respondents (Milton M. and Adrian M. Unger, Newark, attorneys; Sam Denstman, Newark, on the brief).

Judge Panel: Before Judges JAYNE, FRANCIS and SMALLEY.

Case Date: Wednesday February 03, 1954

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

102 A.2d 778 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1954), A-649, Pomeroy v. Simon

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 341 U.S. 428 (1951), 384, Standard Oil Co. v. New Jersey
New Jersey - 101 A.2d 17 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1953), A-617, Original R. & R. Empire Pickle Works, Inc. v. G. Arrigoni & C., Societa Per Azioni
New Jersey - 102 A.2d 784 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1954), A-692, Mechanics Finance Co. v. Paolino
New Jersey - 28 A.2d 528 (N.J.Super.Ch. 1942), 149/37, Slutzker v. Rieber
New Jersey - 73 A.2d 905 (N.J. 1950), No. A--101, Mueller v. Seaboard Commercial Corporation

See all quotations