102 A.2d 16 (N.J. 1954), A-67, Burnett v. Abbott

Citation: 102 A.2d 16, 14 N.J. 291

Opinion Judge: OLIPHANT, J.

Party Name: BURNETT et al. v. ABBOTT.

Attorney: Irving Riker, Newark, argued the cause for the appellants (Riker, Emery & Danzig, newark, attorneys). Francis V. D. Lloyd, Hackensack, argued the cause for the respondent (Theodore D. Parsons, Atty. Gen., attorney).

Judge Panel: For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN-7.

Case Date: January 11, 1954

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

102 A.2d 16 (N.J. 1954), A-67, Burnett v. Abbott

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 72 A.2d 399 (N.J.Super.Ch. 1950), No. C--1176, The Mayor, The City Council, The Board of Public Works of The City of Elizabeth v. The New Jersey Turnpike Authority
New Jersey - 81 A.2d 705 (N.J. 1951), A-141, City of Newark v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority
New Jersey - 18 N.J.Eq. 518 (N.J.Err. & App. 1866), Tide Water Co. v. Coster
New Jersey - 31 N.J.Eq. 475 (N.J.Ch. 1879), Central R. Co. of New Jersey v. Pennsylvania R. Co.