100 S.E.2d 192 (Ga. 1957), 19860, Seckinger v. City of Atlanta

Citation: 100 S.E.2d 192, 213 Ga. 566

Opinion Judge: HEAD, Justice.

Party Name: B. J. SECKINGER et al. v. CITY OF ATLANTA et al.

Attorney: (a) Restrictions upon the of land which are vague, doubtful, and uncertain in meaning can not be enforced in equity., Count two alleges that provisions of a restrictive covenant agreement entered into between the predecessor in title of the corporate, defendants and others, including the predeces...

Case Date: Friday October 11, 1957

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

100 S.E.2d 192 (Ga. 1957), 19860, Seckinger v. City of Atlanta

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 287 U.S. 315 (1932), 9, Reichelderfer v. Quinn
Georgia - 12 S.E.2d 873 (Ga. 1941), 13491, David v. Bowen
Georgia - 16 S.E.2d 714 (Ga. 1941), 13826, Schofield v. Bishop
Georgia - 52 S.E.2d 859 (Ga. 1949), 16594, Lawson v. Lewis
Georgia - 63 S.E.2d 659 (Ga. 1951), 17354, Morgan v. Thomas

See all quotations