100 N.W.2d 275 (Mich. 1960), 35, Johnson v. Miller

Citation: 100 N.W.2d 275, 358 Mich. 529

Opinion Judge: [358 Mich. 536] KELLY, Justice. Justice VOELKER does not explain his reasons how he concludes the statute is ambiguous and awkwardly drawn, and I do not share his view in that regard. The legislature demanded the light on the parked vehicle unless excused by a municipal ordinance drawn under the mandate and provisions of the statute. [358 Mich. 530

Party Name: John Joseph JOHNSON, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Alfred J. MILLER, Defendant, Robert H. Love, Defendant and Appellant.

Attorney: Baker & Durst, Adrian, for plaintiff and appellee. Baldwin & Walker, Adrian (Ward, Plunkett & Cooney, Detroit, of counsel), for defendant and appellant.

Judge Panel: Before the Entire Bench.

Case Date: Monday January 04, 1960

Court: Michigan Supreme Court