100 Cal.App.3d 586, 45596, National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws v. Gain

Citation: 100 Cal.App.3d 586, 161 Cal.Rptr. 181

Opinion Judge: [11] Poche

Party Name: National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws v. Gain

Attorney: [7] Mark I. Soler for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] George Agnost, City Attorney, Steven A. Diaz and Daniel E. Collins III, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendants and Respondents. [9] George Deukmejian, Attorney General, Robert H. Philibosian, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Edward P. O'Brien, ...

Case Date: Friday November 30, 1979

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

100 Cal.App.3d 586, 45596, National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws v. Gain

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 477 F.2d 349 (2nd Cir. 1973), 576, United States v. Kiffer
Federal Cases - 416 F.2d 914 (5th Cir. 1969), 27319, United States v. Drotar
Federal Cases - 380 F.Supp. 404 (E.D.La. 1974), Civ. A. 74-163, Louisiana Affiliate of Nat. Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws (Norml) v. Guste
Federal Cases - 304 U.S. 144 (1938), 640, United States v. Carolene Products Co.
Federal Cases - 379 U.S. 184 (1964), 11, McLaughlin v. Florida

See all quotations