100 A.2d 698 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1953), A-431, Borough of Oakland v. Roth

Citation: 100 A.2d 698, 28 N.J.Super. 321

Opinion Judge: JAYNE, J.A.D.

Party Name: BOROUGH OF OAKLAND v. ROTH et al.

Attorney: James M. Muth, Ramsey, briefed the cause for appellant (Weber, Muth & Weber, Ramsey, attorneys). Chester K. Ligham, Deputy Atty. Gen., argued the cause for the State (Theodore D. Parsons, Atty. Gen.). James A. Major, Hackensack, argued the cause for respondents (Major & Carlsen, Hackensack, attor...

Judge Panel: Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE, and FRANCIS.

Case Date: Thursday November 12, 1953

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

100 A.2d 698 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1953), A-431, Borough of Oakland v. Roth

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 179 A. 116 (N.J.Eq. 1935), State, Ex Rel. State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Company
New Jersey - 198 A. 225 (N.J. 1938), 248, Mansfield & Swett, Inc. v. Town of West Orange
New Jersey - 19 A.2d 219 (N.J.L. 1941), 10, Veix v. Seneca Building and Loan Association of Newark
New Jersey - 75 A.2d 721 (N.J. 1950), No. A--6, In re Arbitration Between New Jersey Bell Telephone Company
New Jersey - 75 A.2d 867 (N.J. 1950), No. A--1, Abelson's, Inc. v. New Jersey State Board of Optometrists

See all quotations