(1) Malcolm Caplan (2) Irene Caplan both of Soufriere, but presently Residing at Baker & McKenzie, Caracas, Venezuela. Plaintiffs v (1) Michael Du Boulay; (2) Michelle Du Boulay; (3) David DuBoulay; (4) DuBoulay Estates Company Ltd all of Soufriere; (5) The Attorney-General of Saint Lucia Defendants [ECSC]
Linked as:
Extract
(1) Malcolm Caplan (2) Irene Caplan both of Soufriere, but presently Residing at Baker & McKenzie, Caracas, Venezuela. Plaintiffs v (1) Michael Du Boulay; (2) Michelle Du Boulay; (3) David DuBoulay; (4) DuBoulay Estates Company Ltd all of Soufriere; (5) The Attorney-General of Saint Lucia Defendants [ECSC]
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Lodge Holes Colliery Company v Wednesbury Corporation
- John Waller port Formedon v Thomas Lambe que praya son age & monstre
REFERS TO
- Gillick (A.P.) v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and the Department of Health and Social Security (England)
- Ex parte Preston (pet. all.)
- Re Westminster City Council
[See more]
CONSIDERS
CITES
This document cites
- O'Reilly v Mackman
- Cocks v Thanet District Council
- F. Hoffmann-LA Roche & Company A.G. and Others v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Gillick (A.P.) v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and the Department of Health and Social Security (England)
- Roy v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Family Practitioner Committee
