1 Cal.App.4th 827, A051994, GTE Sprint Communications Corp. v. State Bd. of Equalization

Citation: 1 Cal.App.4th 827, 2 Cal.Rptr.2d 441

Opinion Judge: [10] Haning

Party Name: GTE Sprint Communications Corp. v. State Bd. of Equalization

Attorney: [7] Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Richard F. Finn and Marguerite C. Stricklin, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Richard N. Wiley for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Thursday December 12, 1991

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

1 Cal.App.4th 827, A051994, GTE Sprint Communications Corp. v. State Bd. of Equalization

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 552 F.Supp. 131 (D.D.C. 1982), Civ. A. 74-1698, United States v. American Tel. and Tel. Co.
Federal Cases - 460 U.S. 1001 (1983), 82-952, Maryland v. United States
California - 44 Cal.3d 1188, S000194, Evangelatos v. Superior Court
California - 156 Cal.App.3d 726, AO16317, Communications Satellite Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd.
California - 186 Cal.App.3d 707, 68809, Rodriguez v. Inglewood Unified School Dist.

See all quotations