[1] Brilla Capital Investment Master Fund Spc Ltd (A Cayman Island segregated portfolio company, for and on behalf of Brilla Cap Juluca Segregated Portolio M, a segregated portfolio thereof) [2] Anguilla Hotel Investors Ltd Appellants v [1] Leeward Isles Resorts Ltd ((in Liquidation)) [2] Charles Hickox [3] Linda Hickox [4] Cap Juluca L&C Ltd [5] William Tacon (the former joint liquidator of Leeward Isles Resorts Ltd) [6] Stuart Mackliar (the former joint liquidator of Leeward Islets Resorts Ltd [7] John Greenwood (the liquidator of Leeward Isles Resorts Ltd [8] Registrar of Companies Respondents [1] Brilla Capital Investment Master Fund SPC Ltd (A Cayman Island segregated portfolio company, for and on behalf of Brilla Cap Juluca Segregated Portolio M, a segre
Linked as:
Extract
[1] Brilla Capital Investment Master Fund Spc Ltd (A Cayman Island segregated portfolio company, for and on behalf of Brilla Cap Juluca Segregated Portolio M, a segregated portfolio thereof) [2] Anguilla Hotel Investors Ltd Appellants v [1] Leeward Isles Resorts Ltd ((in Liquidation)) [2] Charles Hickox [3] Linda Hickox [4] Cap Juluca L&C Ltd [5] William Tacon (the former joint liquidator of Leeward Isles Resorts Ltd) [6] Stuart Mackliar (the former joint liquidator of Leeward Islets Resorts Ltd [7] John Greenwood (the liquidator of Leeward Isles Resorts Ltd [8] Registrar of Companies Respondents [1] Brilla Capital Investment Master Fund SPC Ltd (A Cayman Island segregated portfolio company, for and on behalf of Brilla Cap Juluca Segregated Portolio M, a segre
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Reichhold Norway ASA and Another v Goldman Sachs International (A Firm)
- Un fist feoffment de uno Campo per fait a un & a ses Heirs, en mesme le fait
- AEI Rediffusion Music Ltd v Phonographic Performance Ltd
[See more]
CITES
- Reichhold Norway ASA v Goldman Sachs International [QBD (Comm)]
- AEI Rediffusion Music Ltd v Phonographic Performance Ltd
- Quillen and Others v Harney, Westwood & Riegels (No 2)
APPEAL RESOLVED in