Stanford Law Review

COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.
COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

from November 1998
Last Number: June 2023

Stanford Law School
ISSN 0038-9765


Cantidad de documentos en esta fuente: 1000

February 01, 2007

  • A proposed solution to the problem of parallel pricing in oligopolistic markets.

    • February 01, 2008

  • A textual-historical theory of the Ninth Amendment.

  • Kurt Lash's majoritarian difficulty: a response to a textual-historical theory of the Ninth Amendment.

  • On federalism, freedom, and the founders' view of retained rights: a reply to Randy Barnett.

  • Ex parte Young.

  • The surprisingly stronger case for the legality of the NSA surveillance program: the FDR precedent.

  • Terrorism and the convergence of criminal and military detention models.

  • The Constitution and the rights not to procreate.

  • Privatization and the law and economics of political advocacy.

    • March 01, 2008

  • Fiduciary duties for activist shareholders.

  • Other people's money.

  • Sovereign wealth funds and corporate governance: a minimalist response to the new mercantilism.

  • Corrupting the harm requirement in white collar crime.

  • FCPA prosecutions: liability trend to watch.

  • Defining "national group" in the Genocide Convention: a case study of Timor-Leste.

  • Crawford's aftershock: aligning the regulation of nontestimonial hearsay with the history and purposes of the confrontation clause.

  • Stacked deck: go-shops and auction theory.

    • April 01, 2005

  • The hundred-year decline of trials and the thirty years war.

  • Exploring economic and democratic theories of civil litigation: differences between individual and organizational litigants in the disposition of federal civil cases.

  • Summary judgment and the vanishing trial: implications of the litigation matrix.

  • The what and why of claims resolution facilities.

  • Why me? The role of private trustees in complex claims resolution.

  • Alternative courts? Litigation-induced claims resolution facilities.

  • Class action "cops": public servants or private entrepreneurs?

  • The class action counterreformation.

  • Removing class actions to federal court: a better way to handle the problem of overlapping class actions.

  • Assessing the case for employment arbitration: a new path for empirical research.

  • ADR and the cost of compulsion.

  • Creeping mandatory arbitration: is it just?

  • The court's implicit roadmap: charting the prudent course at the juncture of mandatory arbitration agreements and class action lawsuits.

  • Plea Bargaining's Triumph: A Histosry of Plea Bargaining in America.

    • May 01, 2005

  • Dissenting by deciding.

  • Does affirmative action reduce the number of black lawyers?

  • The real impact of eliminating affirmative action in American law schools: an empirical critique of Richard Sander's study.

  • The big muddy.

  • A systematic response to systemic disadvantage: a response to Sander.

  • A reply to critics.

  • Interpreting rule 68 to conform with the Rules Enabling Act.

  • Four theses: preliminary to an appeal to equity.

  • Gendered justice: do male and female judges rule differently on questions of gay rights?

  • Beyond Breimhorst: appropriate accommodation of students with learning disabilities on the SAT.

  • Perilous Times: Free Speech in Wartime, from the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terrorism.

    • March 01, 2006

  • The unexpected value of litigation: a real options perspective.

  • Threats and meanings: how the facts govern First Amendment doctrine.

  • The superiority of an ideal consumption tax over an ideal income tax.

  • The jurisdictional label: use and misuse.

  • Getting around circumvention: a proposal for taking FECA online.

  • The forestry crisis as a crisis of the rule of law.

  • Adequate access or equal treatment: looking beyond the idea to section 504 in a post-Schaffer public school.

  • Does it take a theory? Originalism, active liberty, and minimalism.