Eucrim. European Law Forum: Prevention. Investigation. Prosecution
from September 2006
Last Number: October 2023
European Anti-Fraud Office
ISSN 1862-6947
Cantidad de documentos en esta fuente: 257
February 06, 2023
The Conflict of Competence between the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and Spanish Prosecutors – Lessons Learned
May 17, 2021
Opportunities and Challenges in Cases Involving Proceeds of Crime
October 05, 2021
Strengthening of International Cooperation in Criminal Matters: Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance
June 01, 2015
Der Rahmenbeschluss zu Abwesenheitsentscheidungen
April 01, 2020
Limits to European Harmonisation of Criminal Law
November 17, 2021
Typologies of EU Fraud
January 24, 2022
Compensation for Unjustified Detention and the European Arrest Warrant
December 01, 2017
OLAF at the Gates of Criminal Law
February 06, 2023
Yachts and Airplanes: What Procedures and Legal Theories Are Being Used to Forfeit Russian Assets in the United States?
September 01, 2014
VAT Carousel Fraud in the EU
December 01, 2012
Legal Nature of European Union Agricultural Penalties
April 01, 2013
Fighting Corruption in Malta and at European Union Levels
August 14, 2019
The Harmonisation of Criminal Sanctions in the European Union - A New Approach
June 01, 2014
EU’s Criminal Policy and the Possible Contents of a New Multi-Annual Programme
March 10, 2021
Refusal of European Arrest Warrants Due to Fair Trial Infringements
March 01, 2013
Guest Editorial eucrim 1/2013
August 14, 2013
Civil Asset Recovery: The American Experience
April 25, 2022
The Role of Local Authorities in the Prevention of and Fight against Money Laundering
February 15, 2021
Independence of Public Prosecutors’ Offices
September 08, 2016
L’échange d’informations entre autorités administratives et judiciaires
December 15, 2020
Strengthening the Fight against Economic and Financial Crime within the EU
September 01, 2015
Council of Europe Convention Against Trafficking of Human Organs
February 18, 2019
Guest Editorial eucrim 4/2018
February 18, 2020
Guest Editorial eucrim 4/2019
August 11, 2022
Guest editorial eucrim 2-2022
February 17, 2022
Guest editorial eucrim 4-2021
December 01, 2017
Guest Editorial eucrim 4/2017
July 28, 2023
Guest editorial eucrim 1-2023
November 17, 2021
Guest editorial eucrim 3-2021
February 02, 2021
Guest Editorial eucrim 3/2020
January 17, 2019
Guest Editorial eucrim 3/2018
April 25, 2022
Guest editorial eucrim 1-2022
September 01, 2016
Guest Editorial 3/2016
December 12, 2022
Editorial eucrim 3-2022
March 01, 2016
Editorial: 10 Years of eucrim
July 01, 2016
Guest Editorial eucrim 2/2016
January 20, 2017
Guest Editorial eucrim 3/2017
December 17, 2019
Guest Editorial eucrim 3/2019
June 01, 2021
Editorial eucrim 1-2021
March 10, 2021
Guest editorial eucrim 4/2020
March 01, 2014
Guest Editorial eucrim 1/2014
June 01, 2018
Guest Editorial eucrim 1/2018
July 10, 2021
Guest editorial eucrim 2-2021
February 06, 2023
Guest editorial eucrim 4-2022
October 19, 2023
The E-evidence Package The Happy Ending of a Long Negotiation Saga
July 25, 2023
Efficiency contra legem? Remarks on the Advocate General’s Opinion Delivered on 22 June 2023 in Case C-281/22 G.K. and Others (Parquet européen)
October 12, 2023
Remote Biometric Identification and Emotion Recognition in the Context of Law Enforcement From the AI Regulation Proposed by the Commission to the EU Co-Legislators’ Positions
October 11, 2023
Electronic Evidence Collection in Cases of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office Legal Framework, Procedures, and Specifics
October 12, 2023
Critical Issues in the New EU Regulation on Electronic Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
October 11, 2023
Die Regulierung des (grenzüberschreitenden) Zugangs zu elektronischen Beweismitteln Aktuelle nationale, europa- und völkerrechtliche Entwicklungen
← Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
Next →
Login
vlex
/